MUJJ的Krypt VPS评测|Mujj Krypt VPS Trial

VPS wdlth 6789℃ 0评论

由于Mujj近日享受完ISO9001服务后,忘乎所以,今天不小心把Akamai泄露到LOC,然后又继续推销他的KT VPS ,引起了我和我的小伙伴们的不满,准备将他去ISO9001的事情“泄露”给母JJ听,这货马上就把持不住了,说赞助一个月KT VPS给我(真抠门)……

他自己说赞助的VPS配置如下:

CPU:Xeon 双核
内存:1GB
硬盘:20GB
独立IP:1个
独享带宽:8M

MUJJ面板
XenSystem面板

我上去看了一下:
cpuinfo:

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.180
cache size : 12288 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good aperfmperf unfair_spinlock pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb dts
bogomips : 4800.36
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.180
cache size : 12288 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good aperfmperf unfair_spinlock pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb dts
bogomips : 4800.36
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

居然是E5620这种老东西,说好的E3大 〇 好呢?

fdisk -l:

Disk /dev/xvdb: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0006cde7

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System

Disk /dev/xvda: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1305 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000858c5

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/xvda1 * 1 64 512000 83 Linux
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/xvda2 64 1306 9972736 8e Linux LVM

Disk /dev/mapper/vg_have-lv_root: 9168 MB, 9168748544 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1114 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

Disk /dev/mapper/vg_have-lv_swap: 1040 MB, 1040187392 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 126 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

常见的10GB + 10GB 模式。

dd结果:

dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=64k count=4k conv=fsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 49.9922 s, 5.4 MB/s

dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 106.975 s, 2.5 MB/s

网络入口带宽:

wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2014-05-10 14:52:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “/dev/null”

100%[========================================================>] 104,857,600 51.0M/s in 2.0s

2014-05-10 14:52:30 (51.0 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [104857600/104857600]

wget http://registrationcenter-download.intel.com/akdlm/irc_nas/4162/l_ccompxe_2013_sp1.3.174.tgz
--2014-05-10 14:53:35-- http://registrationcenter-download.intel.com/akdlm/irc_nas/4162/l_ccompxe_2013_sp1.3.174.tgz
Resolving registrationcenter-download.intel.com... 184.28.188.146, 184.28.188.171
Connecting to registrationcenter-download.intel.com|184.28.188.146|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 2807388904 (2.6G) [application/x-compressed]
Saving to: “l_ccompxe_2013_sp1.3.174.tgz”

100%[======================================================>] 2,807,388,904 9.39M/s in 4m 50s

2014-05-10 14:58:25 (9.25 MB/s) - “l_ccompxe_2013_sp1.3.174.tgz” saved [2807388904/2807388904]

看来应该是百兆入口

speedtest.net测速结果:
上海电信:Krypt到上海电信
广州联通:Krypt到广州联通
上海移动:Krypt到上海移动
看来speedtest cli版本有些问题,ping和距离不对,但是结果还是没问题的……

UnixBench 5.1.3跑分结果(Intel编译器最新版本14.0.3 ,gcc沿用原有4.4.7):

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: MyCloudServer: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
19:38:29 up 8:19, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.18, 0.07; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 10 2014 19:38:29 - 20:06:51
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 13815284.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2954.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 553.7 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 167013.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 45314.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 507067.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 285515.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 46906.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1239.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1921.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 387.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 359599.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 13815284.7 1183.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2954.4 537.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 553.7 128.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 167013.0 421.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 45314.5 273.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 507067.7 874.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 285515.3 229.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 46906.4 117.3
Process Creation 126.0 1239.7 98.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1921.9 453.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 387.8 646.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 359599.3 239.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 327.8

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 10 2014 20:06:51 - 20:35:10
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26556332.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5988.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1182.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 277594.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 74283.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 861385.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 567153.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 90357.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2924.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2945.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 390.9 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 689665.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26556332.7 2275.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5988.5 1088.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1182.3 274.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 277594.3 701.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74283.0 448.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 861385.3 1485.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 567153.4 455.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 90357.7 225.9
Process Creation 126.0 2924.6 232.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2945.0 694.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 390.9 651.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 689665.6 459.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 584.3

看上去性能还是不够理想,不过E5620能达到这个分数也是不错的了。

转载请注明:WDLTH's 斯巴达 » MUJJ的Krypt VPS评测|Mujj Krypt VPS Trial

喜欢 (588)
发表我的评论
取消评论

表情

Hi,您需要填写昵称和邮箱!

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址
cnzz1000134333